Almost every multi-subject commission arrives with the same sentence: we want everyone in it. Everyone can be done. What cannot be done is everyone at the same size, in the same light, at the same distance from the camera, on a canvas the size of a laptop. The difference between a group portrait that works and one that feels like a police lineup is decided before a brush is picked up, in the arithmetic of faces.
You are arranging faces, not people
In a single portrait the subject owns the canvas, and the painter can give a head two-thirds of the available height. A group portrait has to divide that space — and the division is measured in inches of actual face. As a rule, a face needs roughly 2 inches of height on the finished canvas to read as a person from across a room. At 1 to 1.5 inches it stops being a portrait and becomes something you inspect rather than look at: a passport photograph.
The practical consequence is that a canvas carries a fixed number of comfortable faces, and no amount of goodwill changes it. On a 16 × 20 in canvas, two subjects get heads of about 3 inches and look magnificent. Put four on the same canvas and each head drops to roughly 2.2 inches — still workable, but that is the floor, not a starting point. Past that, you are buying a bigger canvas or accepting a smaller painting.
| Canvas | Rows of faces | Comfortable | Tight but possible | Roughly per head |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 × 16 in | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 in / 2.5 in |
| 16 × 20 in | 1–2 | 2 | 4 | 3 in / 2.2 in |
| 20 × 24 in | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 in / 2.7 in |
| 24 × 36 in | 2–3 | 4 | 5 | 3.6 in / 3 in |
| 30 × 40 in | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3.5 in / 3 in |
| 36 × 48 in | 3 | 6 | 8 | 3.4 in / 2.8 in |
Those head heights assume a classic head-and-shoulders arrangement, and a painter can shift them a little by cropping shoulders tighter. Read them as a warning system, not a specification: if your plan puts six faces on a 20 × 24 in canvas, the plan is the problem, not the painter.
Three arrangements that work
Single row — two or three people
All heads on one line, shoulders cropped by the bottom edge. This is the strongest arrangement for a couple, two siblings, or a parent with one child, because every face gets the same light and the same amount of canvas. It stops working at four people: to fit four heads across a 20 in wide canvas each head has to shrink below two inches, which is the point at which a portrait becomes a group photo.
Staggered two rows — four to six people
The tallest figures stand behind, the shorter ones sit or stand in front, and the painter deliberately offsets the heads so that no two are on the same horizontal line. The stagger is what separates a composition from a sports team photo, and it has a second benefit: the back row sits higher and smaller, which reads as distance rather than as shortness. If you have a photograph of the group standing naturally in that formation, send it — it says more about relative heights than any paragraph.
Cluster around an anchor — six or more, or three generations
One seated figure becomes the visual centre — usually a grandparent, or the couple whose anniversary it is — and the others gather around and behind them. This is the arrangement that makes large family portraits work, because the eye is given somewhere to land. Without an anchor, eight equal faces become an even field and the viewer does not know where to look first.
The layout that never works
The team photo: everyone the same size, evenly spaced, all heads level, shoulders square to the viewer. It is the fastest way to spend $1,500 on a painting that looks like a corporate headshot wall. If your source photo is that shape, say so — we would much rather rearrange it than reproduce it.
When no single photograph has everyone in it
It almost never does. The usual case is four photographs of four people, taken years apart, in four kinds of light. That is a normal commission, provided the images agree on a few things.
- One photograph per person, head and shoulders. Send three to five per person if you have them, but mark which one is the face to trust for likeness. Our guide to choosing reference photos covers sharpness and light in detail.
- Resolution has a floor. About 500 pixels across the face is the minimum we can work from honestly; 1,000 pixels or more is comfortable, and any recent phone photo will clear it easily. A face harvested from a crowded group shot is usually 300–400 pixels wide — possible, but you pay for it in likeness.
- Same direction of light. A face lit by a window on the left, standing beside a face lit by a window on the right, will look pasted in no matter how well it is painted. This is the single most common reason a composited group portrait disappoints.
- Similar lens. A 24 mm phone selfie stretches a face at the edge of the frame; an 85 mm portrait compresses it. Side by side, an 8% difference in face width is visible.
- Similar era and grain. A 1978 print that has gone orange next to a 2024 phone photograph needs colour work to sit together. Where a print is creased, faded or torn, restoration is a $60–$70 addition, and the same fee covers compositing separate photographs into one composition.
One honest limit, stated plainly: a painter can invent a background, a jacket, a chair, a sky. A painter cannot invent the shape of a nose that is not in any photograph.
Decide the background before the faces
Most group portraits are painted against an invented background — a soft, low-contrast field of colour that lets the faces do the work. It costs nothing extra and is usually right, because the room in the photograph is rarely the room the painting will hang in.
If you want the original setting kept, choose a photograph where the setting is quiet. Patterned wallpaper, a cluttered kitchen and a strong one-point perspective all fight faces for attention, and the horizon line matters more than people expect: it should sit above the heads, never run through them. Light matters too — a beach photograph comes with hard directional sun, and moving a group out of it into neutral indoor light is a repaint, not a crop.
Six mistakes that make a group portrait look cheap
- Heads on exactly the same line. The eye reads it as a row of objects. Stagger them by a few inches.
- Everyone equally prominent. An anchored composition with a clear centre beats an even field of four identical heads.
- Cropping mid-forearm or through a hand. Crop below the elbow, or crop the shoulders cleanly. Limbs that stop abruptly look like an error even when nobody can name it.
- Mixing sources with contradictory light. Fix this at the photograph stage, not the painting stage.
- Squeezing eight people onto a 16 × 20 in canvas to save money. The saving is real and so is the disappointment — you will have spent $749 on faces nobody can recognise across the room.
- Briefing us to “just make it look natural.” That is a sentence with no information in it. Say which face is the priority, and who can be turned slightly away.
What to send with your brief
- Who is in the painting, their relationships, and one sentence about the occasion. “Four siblings, our parents’ fortieth anniversary” tells a painter more than three paragraphs of adjectives.
- One photograph per person plus one marked primary, sent as original files rather than screenshots or social-media downloads.
- Relative heights. A photograph flattens them. If the youngest now stands taller than his father, say so — it changes the arrangement.
- The wall: a photograph of it, its width, and the colour. Sizing arithmetic lives in our wall-art sizing guide.
- The date it needs to arrive, not the date you plan to order.
What four to six subjects costs
Group pricing depends on two variables only: the canvas size, and how many subjects are on it. The full table is on the custom portraits page; this is the part that matters for groups.
| Canvas size | 1 subject | 2 subjects | 3 subjects | 4+ subjects |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 × 10 in | $189 | — | — | — |
| 12 × 16 in | $289 | $379 | $459 | — |
| 16 × 20 in | $389 | $499 | $619 | $749 |
| 20 × 24 in | $549 | $699 | $849 | $1,029 |
| 24 × 36 in | $789 | $1,059 | $1,290 | $1,560 |
| 30 × 40 in | $1,090 | $1,449 | $1,749 | $2,090 |
| 36 × 48 in | $1,390 | $1,849 | $2,249 | $2,690 |
Painting time is three to five weeks whatever the subject count, plus three to five business days in transit. Rush delivery brings the whole thing into a three-week window, painting included, for $90. Add a further three to five days if you want the canvas stretched and framed locally before it goes on the wall.
The two-canvas alternative worth knowing about
If the group is a couple plus their children, compare a pair of canvases against one large group painting. Two 16 × 20 in single-subject portraits cost $778 together, and each face gets a full three inches of head. One 24 × 36 in canvas carrying four subjects costs $1,560, and each face gets about 2.5 inches. The pair is less than half the price and gives every face more room — and it hangs well, because two canvases of the same height set 2 to 3 inches apart read as one piece. The trade-off is honest: one painting tells one story, two tell two.
The short version
- Faces need about 2 inches on the finished canvas. Count heads before you count dollars.
- Two per row, staggered, beats four in a line. Anchor large groups on one seated figure.
- Separate photographs work — if the light, the lens and the era agree. Restoration or compositing is $60–$70.
- A quiet invented background lets faces carry the painting. A busy room does not.
- Tell us the relative heights. The photograph cannot.
Send the photographs, the wall and the date to the quote page or directly to [email protected], and you will get a fixed price, a suggested canvas size and an honest verdict on the sources, usually within 24 hours. Nothing is charged until you approve all three. Finished multi-subject work is in our portrait gallery, and the full process from first email to doorstep is set out on the how it works page.